|
|
Was this forwarded to you? Get The Fourth Estate AI Brief in your inbox →
|
|
|
|
View this issue in your browser
Tuesday Brief
The Local Press Goes to Court, Google Plays Hardball, and Asia Builds Its Own AI
The interesting thing this week with AI and publishing — the local press finally stopped waiting for someone else to fight the copyright battle. Nearly 400 community newspapers filed suit against OpenAI and Microsoft on Tuesday. Meanwhile, Google is telling publishers to hand over training rights or lose their Showcase payments. And overseas, Asian AI labs are shipping frontier models while Anthropic's export ban drags on. Three stories, one theme: the rules of who owns what — and who gets to use what — are being written right now.
|
|
THE LOCAL PRESS FIGHTS BACK
The Rundown: The biggest copyright case community papers have ever brought landed in Manhattan federal court this week.
The details:
- A coalition led by Richner Communications filed a 55-page complaint alleging OpenAI and Microsoft copied hundreds of thousands of articles without permission or payment.
- Named plaintiffs include the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, the New York Amsterdam News, Ogden Newspapers, and Straus Newspapers.
- The complaint alleges both companies 'systematically and secretly crawled' news sites, including pages behind paywalls, then stripped out bylines, publication names, and copyright notices.
- Matthew Platkin, former New Jersey attorney general, is lead counsel; the suit seeks statutory damages, actual damages, return of profits, and legal fees.
Why it matters for us: If you're running a 6,000-circ weekly, this is your fight — the papers suing are your peers, not the New York Times. The outcome could set the price tag for what your archives are actually worth to AI companies.
Read at thenextweb.com →
|
|
|
GOOGLE'S ULTIMATUM
The Rundown: A new AI partnership program comes with strings attached — and a deadline.
The details:
- Google is pitching publishers a pilot program that would promote their content in AI Overviews in exchange for broad rights to use that content for AI training.
- Publishers who decline reportedly face losing payments from Showcase, Google's current content-licensing arrangement, which is being wound down.
- Digital Content Next CEO Jason Kint told the Post: 'There's no fair deal discussions that can happen with Google. It's really a matter of how much money they want to drop.'
- A Pew study found users who see an AI Overview are half as likely to click through to a publisher's site.
Why it matters for us: If your paper relies on Google traffic — and most of us do — the math just changed. You're being asked to trade training rights for visibility you used to get for free. That's a question for your next budget meeting, not a someday hypothetical.
Read at nypost.com →
|
|
|
THE EXPORT BAN FALLOUT
The Rundown: Two weeks into the U.S. export ban, competitors are filling the gap.
The details:
- Chinese firm 360 unveiled Tulongfeng, claiming it matches Anthropic's Mythos, the cybersecurity-focused model banned from export by the Trump administration.
- Tokyo-based Sakana AI launched Fugu, a frontier model it says 'stands shoulder-to-shoulder' with Anthropic's Fable 5 and Mythos Preview.
- Sakana's website now advertises 'delivering frontier capability without the risk of export controls.'
- Sakana co-founder Ren Ito said at the G7 summit that U.S. models 'remain important to Asia' but export controls are reshaping buyer calculations.
Why it matters for us: This feels distant from a county-seat newsroom, but it's not. If AI development fragments by geography, the tools you'll have access to — and the terms you'll get — depend on where you sit. Watch which models your vendors can actually use.
Read at techcrunch.com →
|
|
|
THE UPDATE
Quick hits from the week
The Rundown: Smaller items that shipped, leaked, or surfaced.
The details:
- Reuters reports the White House has released Anthropic's Mythos to some U.S. companies under a restricted pilot — watch for vendor announcements if your AI tools suddenly get more capable.
- The local-press lawsuit names Microsoft Copilot alongside ChatGPT; if your newsroom uses Copilot for Office tasks, you're now a customer of a defendant in a peer lawsuit.
|
|
|
What is?
Tokens
What it is: A token is the chunk an AI actually reads — not a word, not a letter, something in between. Most models break text into pieces of about four characters, so one token is roughly three-quarters of a word. "The" is one token; "newspaper" might be two; a comma is its own token. The AI never sees your sentence as words the way you do — it sees a stream of tokens, and everything it writes back is built one token at a time. You can watch it happen: paste any paragraph into OpenAI's tokenizer and see your own writing split into the pieces the machine reads.
Why publishers care: Two reasons, and both hit close to home. First, it's the meter — every AI tool bills by the token, counting what you feed in plus what it writes back. When a vendor quotes you a price, that's the unit underneath it, which is why a long records dump costs more to process than a short email. Second, it's this week's copyright fight in a single word. When those 400 papers say OpenAI "copied" their articles, what the company actually did was chop every story into tokens and train on them. Your journalism, measured out in tokens, is the raw material — they took the thing in the very same unit they turn around and sell!!
Visit platform.openai.com →
|
|
|
|
That's the week. The local press is in court, Google is rewriting the rules, and the AI supply chain is more complicated than it was a month ago. None of this is theoretical anymore — it's budget-line-item real. If you want to talk through what any of this means for your paper, hit reply. I read everything.
Trevor Slette runs Quadd.ai — AI tools built for publishers.
|
|
— Trevor
Trevor Slette
Co-founder, Quadd.ai · 28-year community publisher
trevors@quadd.ai
·
Book a 15-min call
·
LinkedIn
P.S. P.S. Quick one — if Google offered your paper Showcase money in exchange for training rights, would you take the deal? Hit reply and tell me; I'm genuinely curious how publishers are weighing this one!!
|
|
|
|
|
Turn PDFs into publishable copy.
Court records, box scores, honor rolls, fair results, meeting minutes — the documents that should not eat up an afternoon. Quadd's Document Intelligence learns your paper's exact layout, then turns the messy files into clean, copy-paste-ready text. Court reports we used to retype for an hour now take three minutes. Same number, every time.
See how Document Intelligence works →
|
|
|